🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, coercive communications continued. Initially, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, subsequently from the police themselves. In the end, one resident claims he was summoned to the local precinct and told clearly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is one of many resisting a high-value project where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – will be razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The culture of the slum is unparalleled in the globe," explains Shaikh. "However they want to dismantle our social fabric and stop us speaking out."

Dual Worlds

The dank gullies of Dharavi stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and elite residences that dominate the area. Dwellings are built haphazardly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses produce dangerous fumes and the atmosphere is filled with the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.

Among some individuals, the prospect of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and apartments with two toilets is an aspirational dream come true.

"We don't have proper healthcare, roads or drainage and there are no spaces for youth to recreate," says a tea vendor, 56, who moved from his home state in 1982. "The sole solution is to tear it all down and construct proper housing."

Resident Opposition

But others, including Shaikh, are fighting against the plan.

All recognize that the slum, long neglected as informal housing, is in stark need investment and development. However they are concerned that this project – absent of resident participation – might turn valuable urban land into a luxury development, forcing out the marginalized, immigrant populations who have been there since the nineteenth century.

These were these shunned, displaced people who established the vacant wetlands into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose production is worth between one million dollars and two million dollars per year, making it a major informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Out of about one million residents living in the crowded sprawling zone, fewer than half will be able for new homes in the development, which is estimated to take seven years to finish. Others will be transferred to barren areas and salt plains on the distant periphery of the city, threatening to fragment a long-established social network. Certain individuals will not get housing at all.

Residents permitted to continue living in the neighborhood will be allocated flats in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the natural, communal way of residing and operating that has sustained the community for many years.

Businesses from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are projected to decrease in quantity and be transferred to a designated "commercial zone" separated from homes.

Survival Challenge

For residents like this protester, a craftsman and long-time resident to call home Dharavi, the redevelopment presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-floor operation produces garments – sharp blazers, luxury coats, decorated jackets – marketed in premium stores in the city's affluent areas and overseas.

Relatives dwells in the accommodations underneath and laborers and garment workers – workers from north India – also sleep in the same building, allowing him to manage costs. Beyond the slum, housing costs are often 10 times more expensive for basic accommodation.

Threats and Warning

In the official facilities in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan illustrates a contrasting perspective. Slickly dressed people mill about on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, acquiring western-style baked goods and pastries and socializing on an outdoor area adjacent to Dharavi Cafe and treat station. This represents a world away from the affordable idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that sustains Dharavi's community.

"This isn't development for our community," states the protester. "It's a huge land development that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

There is also distrust of the corporate group. Headed by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and an associate of the national leader – the corporation has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and financial impropriety, which it denies.

Even as the state government calls it a partnership, the business group paid $950m for its controlling interest. A lawsuit claiming that the redevelopment was improperly granted to the developer is pending in the nation's highest judicial body.

Sustained Harassment

Since they began to actively protest the redevelopment, Shaikh and other residents state they have been subjected to a long-running campaign of coercion and warning – involving phone calls, clear intimidation and suggestions that criticizing the project was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by people they allege represent the developer.

Part of the group accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c