🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it because then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.